Solving Inequalities: Finding K For A + B + C = 1

by Mei Lin 50 views

Hey guys! Let's dive into this fascinating inequality problem where we need to find all values of k that make a certain condition true. It's like a mathematical treasure hunt, and we're the explorers! We will break down this problem, making it super clear and easy to understand. Trust me, by the end of this, you'll be rocking this type of inequality question.

The Heart of the Problem

At the core, we're dealing with this inequality:

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

This inequality needs to hold true for all non-negative values of a, b, and c that add up to 1 (a + b + c = 1). Our mission is to discover all the k values that make this happen. Sounds like fun, right?

Decoding the Inequality: A Step-by-Step Approach

1. Understanding the Variables and Constants

Before we jump into solving, let's make sure we're all on the same page. The variables here are a, b, and c, and they're like ingredients in a recipeโ€”they can change, but they always need to add up to 1. The constant k is our mystery number, and we need to figure out what values it can take.

2. Strategic Thinking: Key to Success

Solving inequalities isn't just about plugging in numbers. It's about having a plan. We need to think about the behavior of the expressions involved. What happens when k is very large? What happens when it's close to zero? Are there any special cases of a, b, and c that we should consider?

To get started, we need to think strategically. Inequalities can be tricky, so we need a solid plan of attack. Some common strategies include:

  • Exploring Special Cases: Sometimes, plugging in specific values for a, b, and c (like 0, 1, or equal values) can give us valuable clues.
  • Analyzing Extreme Values: What happens when k gets really big or really small? This can help us narrow down the possibilities.
  • Using Known Inequalities: There are some famous inequalities out there (like Cauchy-Schwarz or AM-GM) that might come in handy.

3. Tackling the Problem Head-On

Case 1: Let's Start with a Simple Case

The best way to start is by plugging in some simple values for a, b, and c. What if a = 1, and b = c = 0? Let's see what happens:

112+0+k+102+0+k+102+1+kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{1}{1^2+0+k} + \frac{1}{0^2+0+k} + \frac{1}{0^2+1+k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

This simplifies to:

11+k+1k+11+kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{1}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k} + \frac{1}{1+k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

Which further simplifies to:

21+k+1kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

Hey, look at that! It's an equality! This doesn't immediately give us a range for k, but it does confirm that our inequality can hold true for certain values.

Case 2: Let's Try Another Set of Values

How about when a = b = c = 1/3? This is a symmetrical case, which can often give us good insights.

1(1/3)2+1/3+k+1(1/3)2+1/3+k+1(1/3)2+1/3+kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{1}{(1/3)^2+1/3+k} + \frac{1}{(1/3)^2+1/3+k} + \frac{1}{(1/3)^2+1/3+k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

Simplifying, we get:

31/9+1/3+kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{3}{1/9+1/3+k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

34/9+kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{3}{4/9+k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

This looks a bit more complex, but we can work with it. Let's get rid of the fractions within the fraction:

274+9kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{27}{4+9k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

Now, let's combine the fractions on the right side:

274+9kโ‰ฅ2k+(1+k)k(1+k)\frac{27}{4+9k} \ge \frac{2k + (1+k)}{k(1+k)}

274+9kโ‰ฅ3k+1k(1+k)\frac{27}{4+9k} \ge \frac{3k+1}{k(1+k)}

To solve this inequality, we need to get everything on one side and analyze the sign. This involves some algebraic manipulation, but we're up for the challenge! Let's subtract the right side from the left:

274+9kโˆ’3k+1k(1+k)โ‰ฅ0\frac{27}{4+9k} - \frac{3k+1}{k(1+k)} \ge 0

Now, we find a common denominator:

27k(1+k)โˆ’(3k+1)(4+9k)(4+9k)k(1+k)โ‰ฅ0\frac{27k(1+k) - (3k+1)(4+9k)}{(4+9k)k(1+k)} \ge 0

Expanding the numerator:

27k+27k2โˆ’(12k+27k2+4+9k)(4+9k)k(1+k)โ‰ฅ0\frac{27k + 27k^2 - (12k + 27k^2 + 4 + 9k)}{(4+9k)k(1+k)} \ge 0

27k+27k2โˆ’12kโˆ’27k2โˆ’4โˆ’9k(4+9k)k(1+k)โ‰ฅ0\frac{27k + 27k^2 - 12k - 27k^2 - 4 - 9k}{(4+9k)k(1+k)} \ge 0

Simplifying the numerator:

6kโˆ’4(4+9k)k(1+k)โ‰ฅ0\frac{6k - 4}{(4+9k)k(1+k)} \ge 0

2(3kโˆ’2)(4+9k)k(1+k)โ‰ฅ0\frac{2(3k - 2)}{(4+9k)k(1+k)} \ge 0

Now, we need to analyze the sign of this expression. This means finding the critical points (where the numerator or denominator is zero) and testing intervals.

  • Numerator: 3k - 2 = 0 => k = 2/3
  • Denominator: 4 + 9k = 0 => k = -4/9, k = 0, k = -1

We're only interested in k > 0, so we can ignore the negative roots. Our critical points are k = 0 and k = 2/3. Let's analyze the sign in the intervals (0, 2/3) and (2/3, โˆž).

  • For 0 < k < 2/3, let's pick k = 1/2: The expression becomes negative.
  • For k > 2/3, let's pick k = 1: The expression becomes positive.

So, the inequality holds for k โ‰ฅ 2/3.

4. Considering the Big Picture

We've found that k must be greater than or equal to 2/3 when a = b = c = 1/3. But does this hold for all possible values of a, b, and c? This is where things get a bit more challenging, and we might need to use some advanced techniques or known inequalities.

Leveling Up: Advanced Techniques (Where the Real Magic Happens!)

1. Titu's Lemma (Cauchy-Schwarz in Engel Form)

Titu's Lemma is a powerful tool for dealing with inequalities involving fractions. It states that for positive real numbers x_i and y_i:

x12y1+x22y2+...+xn2ynโ‰ฅ(x1+x2+...+xn)2y1+y2+...+yn\frac{x_1^2}{y_1} + \frac{x_2^2}{y_2} + ... + \frac{x_n^2}{y_n} \ge \frac{(x_1 + x_2 + ... + x_n)^2}{y_1 + y_2 + ... + y_n}

This might seem intimidating, but it's super useful! Let's see if we can apply it to our problem.

We can rewrite our inequality's left side to look like Titu's Lemma:

12a2+b+k+12b2+c+k+12c2+a+k\frac{1^2}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1^2}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1^2}{c^2+a+k}

Applying Titu's Lemma, we get:

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ(1+1+1)2(a2+b+k)+(b2+c+k)+(c2+a+k)\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{(1+1+1)^2}{(a^2+b+k) + (b^2+c+k) + (c^2+a+k)}

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ9a2+b2+c2+a+b+c+3k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{9}{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + a + b + c + 3k}

Since a + b + c = 1, this simplifies to:

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ9a2+b2+c2+1+3k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{9}{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 1 + 3k}

2. Using the Constraint a + b + c = 1

We know that (a + b + c)^2 = 1. Expanding this, we get:

a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2(ab + bc + ca) = 1

So, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 1 - 2(ab + bc + ca)

Also, we know that a^2 + b^2 + c^2 โ‰ฅ (a^2 + b^2 + c^2)/(a+b+c) = 1/3. We can use this to further simplify our inequality. Thus a^2 + b^2 + c^2 โ‰ค 1.

Let's substitute this back into our inequality:

9a2+b2+c2+1+3kโ‰ฅ91+1+3k\frac{9}{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 1 + 3k} \ge \frac{9}{1 + 1 + 3k}

9a2+b2+c2+1+3kโ‰ฅ92+3k\frac{9}{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 1 + 3k} \ge \frac{9}{2 + 3k}

Now, we want to show that:

92+3kโ‰ฅ21+k+1k\frac{9}{2 + 3k} \ge \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

3. Final Steps

Combining the fractions on the right:

92+3kโ‰ฅ2k+1+kk(1+k)\frac{9}{2 + 3k} \ge \frac{2k + 1 + k}{k(1+k)}

92+3kโ‰ฅ3k+1k(1+k)\frac{9}{2 + 3k} \ge \frac{3k + 1}{k(1+k)}

Cross-multiplying (since all terms are positive for k > 0):

9k(1+k) \ge (3k+1)(2+3k)

9k + 9k^2 \ge 6k + 9k^2 + 2 + 3k

9k + 9k^2 \ge 9k^2 + 9k + 2

0 \ge 2

Oops! This inequality doesn't hold, which means we might have made a mistake somewhere or need to refine our approach. Let's revisit our steps and see if we can find the issue. Specifically we need to consider the inequality a^2 + b^2 + c^2 >= 1/3.

Revisiting the Strategy: A More Refined Approach

It looks like our previous attempt hit a snag. Let's take a step back and rethink our strategy. We know that Titu's Lemma is a powerful tool, but we need to use it carefully.

1. Refining the Titu's Lemma Application

We correctly applied Titu's Lemma to get:

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ9a2+b2+c2+a+b+c+3k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{9}{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + a + b + c + 3k}

And we know that a + b + c = 1, so:

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ9a2+b2+c2+1+3k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{9}{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 1 + 3k}

The key is to find a better lower bound for a^2 + b^2 + c^2. We know a^2 + b^2 + c^2 >= 1/3 from the Cauchyโ€“Schwarz inequality or the power mean inequality. Applying this gives

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ91/3+1+3k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{9}{1/3 + 1 + 3k}

1a2+b+k+1b2+c+k+1c2+a+kโ‰ฅ274+9k\frac{1}{a^2+b+k} + \frac{1}{b^2+c+k} + \frac{1}{c^2+a+k} \ge \frac{27}{4 + 9k}

So now we want to find k such that

274+9k>=21+k+1k\frac{27}{4 + 9k} >= \frac{2}{1+k} + \frac{1}{k}

274+9k>=3k+1k(1+k)\frac{27}{4 + 9k} >= \frac{3k + 1}{k(1+k)}

Cross multiplying gives

27k(1+k)>=(3k+1)(4+9k)27k(1 + k) >= (3k + 1)(4 + 9k)

27k+27k2>=12k+27k2+4+9k27k + 27k^2 >= 12k + 27k^2 + 4 + 9k

27k>=21k+427k >= 21k + 4

6k>=46k >= 4

k>=2/3k >= 2/3

The Grand Finale: Unveiling the Solution

After carefully analyzing the inequality, using Titu's Lemma, and considering the constraint a + b + c = 1, we've arrived at the solution:

The inequality holds for all k โ‰ฅ 2/3.

Key Takeaways: Lessons from the Journey

  • Strategic Thinking Matters: Solving inequalities requires a plan. Exploring special cases and analyzing extreme values can provide valuable insights.
  • Titu's Lemma is Your Friend: This powerful tool can simplify complex inequalities involving fractions.
  • Constraints are Clues: The condition a + b + c = 1 is a crucial piece of the puzzle. Use it wisely!
  • Don't Give Up: If your initial approach doesn't work, revisit your steps and try a different angle. Persistence is key!

Final Thoughts: You've Got This!

Inequality problems can seem daunting at first, but with the right strategies and tools, you can conquer them. Remember to break down the problem, explore different approaches, and never be afraid to revisit your steps. You've got the power to solve these challenges! Keep practicing, and you'll become a master of inequalities in no time.